ARTICLES 1 JAN 12 (Double Holiday edition)
Authored: January 1st, 2012 @ 6:07 PM
ECONOMICS / BUSINESS
This sums it up pretty well: “Go down to Occupy Wall Street, and you’ll find a lot of cultural-studies majors who support changing systemic rules to flatten the inequality slope. Go into the financial-institution office buildings that surround them, and you’ll find a lot of math majors devising computer models for risk-weighting assets who think the people at the bottom of the slope should try harder to get into the top.”
Here is a very readable article on the limits of Keynesian policy.
The Washington Post writes an editorial which actually makes reference to the efficiency/ income conundrum. They do fall back on Arthur Okun and his call for trying to get more equity at the cost of some growth, I don’t really agree with that; I wouldn’t mind falling behind my neighbors in income growth as long as my material standard of living increased faster than it does now.
James Pethokoukis, the money and politics columnist for U.S. News & World Report writes a nice little piece over at the American Enterprise Institute blog.
Here’s very interesting analogy, although the author stretches it too far. He also restates the conventional wisdom of three possible outcomes; the world is much more complex than this and we’re deluding ourselves to believe that we can narrow the outcomes to just three, but still worth the investment of time to read.
I needed to wait until the 28th of DEC to find what is probably the best economics article of the year (at least as far as readability goes).
Rarely does the Washington Post publish an article this good, but then it is on the Opinion page and seems to be written by someone who understands finance. It’s important to remember the it was “off balance sheet” shenanigans which caused Enron to implode and regulators to over react on U.S. listed businesses by passing Sarbanes-Oxley. Maybe those same regulators should spend more time looking at the unsustainable “off balance sheet” liabilities of the Federal Government.
GENERAL INTEREST
Here’s a nice opinion piece from the Star Tribune on Hamline University and Tom Emmer.
Spin can be tough. Here’s where spin crossed the line. The biggest lie of 2011 goes to……….
I always find it odd that some people think it’s a bad thing when Congress doesn’t pass a bunch of unnecessary laws or burdensome regulation.
Nobel Award winning economist famously said: “Nothing is so permanent as a temporary government program.” I wish the Sunset Commission the best of luck.
The money wars with the Democrats.
80 percent of the respondents of likely Iowa caucus goers selected either “the economy and jobs,” “the size and role of the federal government” or the “national debt and the deficit” as their major issue. Very similar to everywhere else this cycle would be my guess.
My daughter’s Brownie troop folded and she seems to have moved on to other things. this is just as well, as I’m not sure I’d be able to support her continued participation in this organization.
Enjoy,
Stephen Kallestad
Northfield